Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 vs Motorola Edge 60 neo
On the EU energy label the Motorola Edge 60 neo comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 56/100, Motorola Edge 60 neo 64/100.
| Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 | Motorola Edge 60 neo | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 56/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 99.1 h | 54.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 4,850 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.54/5 | 4.04/5 |
| Repairability class | B | A |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 68 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG ACE 5 | edge 60 neo (XT2509-1) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.