Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 vs Doogee M30 Max
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 56/100, Doogee M30 Max 56/100.
| Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 | Doogee M30 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | C |
| Durability score | 56/100 | 56/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 99.1 h | 63.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 48 |
| Drop reliability class | B | D |
| Repairability index | 3.54/5 | 3.62/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG ACE 5 | M30 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.