Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 vs vivo V70 (V2540)
On the EU energy label the vivo V70 (V2540) comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 27/100, vivo V70 (V2540) 27/100.
| Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 | vivo V70 (V2540) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | A |
| Durability score | 27/100 | 27/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 40.8 h | 52.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 900 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 5,230 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 45 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | D | C |
| Repairability index | 3.46/5 | 3/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 55 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Z2458 | V2540 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.