Blackview Tab50WiFi vs Rebecco Z50
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Blackview Tab50WiFi 53/100, Rebecco Z50 53/100.
| Blackview Tab50WiFi | Rebecco Z50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | E |
| Durability score | 53/100 | 53/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 89.3 h | 5.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,580 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 112 | 50 |
| Drop reliability class | C | E |
| Repairability index | 3.49/5 | 3.65/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP20 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 5 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | Tab 50 WiFi | Z50 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.