Blackview Tab 16 Pro vs Hotwav Pad 13 Pro
On the EU energy label the Blackview Tab 16 Pro comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Blackview Tab 16 Pro 64/100, Hotwav Pad 13 Pro 64/100.
| Blackview Tab 16 Pro | Hotwav Pad 13 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | D |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 97.6 h | 105.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 6,580 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 156 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | B | E |
| Repairability index | 3.38/5 | 3.37/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP20 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | Tab 16 Pro | Pad 13 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.