Blackview Tab 16 Pro vs CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254)
On the EU energy label the CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Blackview Tab 16 Pro 64/100, CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) 64/100.
| Blackview Tab 16 Pro | CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | E |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 97.6 h | 118.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,700 mAh | 9,500 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 156 | 16 |
| Drop reliability class | B | E |
| Repairability index | 3.38/5 | 3.89/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 20 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Tab 16 Pro | CTITANULTRAX |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.