AORLYM P12 Power vs BIRDCLAW P8-B
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 0 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: AORLYM P12 Power 67/100, BIRDCLAW P8-B 67/100.
| AORLYM P12 Power | BIRDCLAW P8-B | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | F |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 120.7 h | 120.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 12,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.38/5 | 3.38/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP20 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | P12 Plus | P13 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.