Acer AS10WF NEO vs TCL TAB 10 Gen4
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Acer AS10WF NEO 51/100, TCL TAB 10 Gen4 51/100.
| Acer AS10WF NEO | TCL TAB 10 Gen4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | D |
| Durability score | 51/100 | 51/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 80.8 h | 98.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,820 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | E | D |
| Repairability index | 3.2/5 | 3.09/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-A |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | AS10WF NEO | 8483A |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.