vivo Y31e 5G vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
On the EU energy label the vivo Y31e 5G comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: vivo Y31e 5G 40/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro 40/100.
| vivo Y31e 5G | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 40/100 | 40/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 44.5 h | 70.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,600 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,060 mAh | 6,830 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 2.95/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 44 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | V2533 | 2602EPTC0G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.