Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs TCL 60 SE
On the EU energy label the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 42/100, TCL 60 SE 43/100.
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | TCL 60 SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 42/100 | 43/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 51.2 h | 49.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,854 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 210 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 2.78/5 | 3.44/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP48 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 1 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | SM-F976B | T517H |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.