REDMI Note 17 vs vivo X300 FE (V2542)
On the EU energy label the vivo X300 FE (V2542) comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: REDMI Note 17 36/100, vivo X300 FE (V2542) 36/100.
| REDMI Note 17 | vivo X300 FE (V2542) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 69 h | 49.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,550 mAh | 5,255 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | C | C |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 2.93/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 26012RN62Y | V2542 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.