REDMI Note 15 5G vs vivo X300 FE (V2537)
On the EU energy label the vivo X300 FE (V2537) comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: REDMI Note 15 5G 40/100, vivo X300 FE (V2537) 40/100.
| REDMI Note 15 5G | vivo X300 FE (V2537) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 40/100 | 40/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 51.4 h | 58.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,370 mAh | 6,350 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | A | C |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 2.93/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 45 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 25098RA98G | V2537 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.