REDMI 17C 5G vs vivo X500 Pro (V2621)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: REDMI 17C 5G 47/100, vivo X500 Pro (V2621) 47/100.
| REDMI 17C 5G | vivo X500 Pro (V2621) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 47/100 | 47/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 69.6 h | 64.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,850 mAh | 6,305 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 2.97/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 2607FRNEAG | V2621 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.