Philips S8310 vs vivo X500 Pro Max
On the EU energy label the vivo X500 Pro Max comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Philips S8310 46/100, vivo X500 Pro Max 49/100.
| Philips S8310 | vivo X500 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 49/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 47.6 h | 72.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 6,570 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.6/5 | 2.97/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Philips S8310 | V2610 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.