Oukitel C62 Pro A15 vs Philips S8310
On the EU energy label the Philips S8310 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oukitel C62 Pro A15 46/100, Philips S8310 46/100.
| Oukitel C62 Pro A15 | Philips S8310 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 46/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 47.5 h | 47.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.33/5 | 3.6/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | C62 Pro | Philips S8310 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.