Oukitel C26 Mini go vs vivo X300 FE (V2537)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Oukitel C26 Mini go 40/100, vivo X300 FE (V2537) 40/100.
| Oukitel C26 Mini go | vivo X300 FE (V2537) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 40/100 | 40/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 24.4 h | 58.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 2,300 mAh | 6,350 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 195 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 3.44/5 | 2.93/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | C26 Mini | V2537 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.