Oppo Reno16 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
On the EU energy label the Oppo Reno16 Pro 5G comes out ahead in 3 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oppo Reno16 Pro 5G 68/100, Samsung Galaxy A27 5G 44/100.
| Oppo Reno16 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 68/100 | 44/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 62 h | 51.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,820 mAh | 4,860 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.87/5 | 3.15/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CPH2863 | SM-A276B/DS |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.