Oppo Reno16 5G vs TCL P80 Pro
On the EU energy label the TCL P80 Pro comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oppo Reno16 5G 64/100, TCL P80 Pro 64/100.
| Oppo Reno16 5G | TCL P80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 63.2 h | 66.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,820 mAh | 5,600 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.52/5 | 3.58/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CPH2865 | T852K |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.