Oppo Reno16 5G vs Oukitel C1 Pro
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 1 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Oppo Reno16 5G 64/100, Oukitel C1 Pro 64/100.
| Oppo Reno16 5G | Oukitel C1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 63.2 h | 65.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,820 mAh | 5,150 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.52/5 | 3.47/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | CPH2865 | C1 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.