MUNBYN AS01 vs Oukitel WP68
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: MUNBYN AS01 61/100, Oukitel WP68 61/100.
| MUNBYN AS01 | Oukitel WP68 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 90.8 h | 86.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,500 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 3,520 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 287 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.1/5 | 3.24/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | AS01 | WP68, WP68 Air 4G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.