Hotwav A36 (A56) vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Hotwav A36 (A56) 41/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 5G 41/100.
| Hotwav A36 (A56) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | B |
| Durability score | 41/100 | 41/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 37.4 h | 43.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 4,860 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.44/5 | 3.15/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | A56 | SM-A176B/DS |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.