Hotwav A25 Ultra vs POCO M8 5G
On the EU energy label the POCO M8 5G comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Hotwav A25 Ultra 39/100, POCO M8 5G 39/100.
| Hotwav A25 Ultra | POCO M8 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | B |
| Durability score | 39/100 | 39/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 45.5 h | 50.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,370 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.15/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP65 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | A26 Ultra | 25118PC98G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.