Skip to content

Hitachi RAM-53NP2B / RAD-18QPB + RAK-35RPB vs Panasonic CS-E9PB4EA / CU-E9PB4EA

The Panasonic CS-E9PB4EA / CU-E9PB4EA uses 121 kWh less a year, about €34 a year at the EU average price.

Hitachi RAM-53NP2B / RAD-18QPB + RAK-35RPBPanasonic CS-E9PB4EA / CU-E9PB4EA
Energy classA+A+
Annual consumption272 kWh151 kWh
Running cost (EU avg.)€77/year€43/year
Functioncooling and heatingcooling and heating
Cooling capacity5.3 kW5.8 kW
Heating capacity5 kW4 kW
SEER (cooling)6.82.5
SCOP (heating, average climate)4.22.7
Annual cooling consumption272 kWh151 kWh
Annual heating consumption (average climate)1,665 kWh945 kWh
Heating classAPAP
Indoor noise54 dB(A)50 dB(A)
Outdoor noise62 dB(A)60 dB(A)
RefrigerantR410AR410A
Refrigerant GWP2,0882,088
Model numbersRAM-53NP2B / RAD-18QPB + RAK-35RPB, RAM-53NP2B / RAD-18QPB + RAK-35RXB, RAM-53NP3B / RAD-18QPB + RAK-35RPB, RAM-53NP3B / RAD-18QPB + RAK-35RXBCS-E9PB4EA / CU-E9PB4EA

Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.