Hammer 3HB965EX vs Midea 7NM30E0IX
The Midea 7NM30E0IX uses 61 kWh less a year, about €17 a year at the EU average price.
| Hammer 3HB965EX | Midea 7NM30E0IX | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A+ |
| Annual consumption | 110 kWh | 49 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €31/year | €14/year |
| Heat source | electric | electric |
| Cavities | 1 | 1 |
| Usable volume | 66 L | 72 L |
| Energy per cycle (conventional) | 1.08 kWh | 1.02 kWh |
| Energy per cycle (fan-forced) | 1.1 kWh | 0.49 kWh |
| Energy efficiency index | 131 | 57.6 |
| Model numbers | 3HB965EX, 2HB965EW | 7NM30E0IX |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.