Guangzhou Hongyu Digital Technology ZMON-VIBOX-23-75HZ-HL1 vs Kodak WF238V (2026 registration)
The Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) uses 19 kWh less a year, about €5 a year at the EU average price.
| Guangzhou Hongyu Digital Technology ZMON-VIBOX-23-75HZ-HL1 | Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | B |
| Annual consumption | 27.6 kWh | 8.8 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €8/year | €2/year |
| Type | monitor | monitor |
| Screen size | 23″ | 24″ |
| Screen size | 58.4 cm | 58 cm |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 px | 1920×1080 px |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Power in SDR mode | 12.6 W | 4 W |
| Standby | 0.2 W | 0.5 W |
| Networked standby | 0 W | 0 W |
| Automatic brightness control | No | No |
| Software updates for at least | 5 years | 3 years |
| Spare parts for at least | 5 years | 2 years |
| Model numbers | ZMON-VIBOX-23-75HZ-HL1 | WF238V |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.