FOSSiBOT F118 vs Hotwav Note 15
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: FOSSiBOT F118 43/100, Hotwav Note 15 43/100.
| FOSSiBOT F118 | Hotwav Note 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 43/100 | 43/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 97.1 h | 47.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 2.66/5 | 3.55/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP20 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | F118 | Note 15 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.