FOSSiBOT F106 Pro vs Motorola Razr 70 plus
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: FOSSiBOT F106 Pro 58/100, Motorola Razr 70 plus 58/100.
| FOSSiBOT F106 Pro | Motorola Razr 70 plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | A |
| Durability score | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 76.3 h | 48.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 4,360 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 175 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.07/5 | 3.46/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP48 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Charging power | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | F106 Pro | razr 70 plus (XT2659-3) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.