Danew Konnect 660 vs vivo Y21 5G (V2553)
On the EU energy label the vivo Y21 5G (V2553) comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Danew Konnect 660 32/100, vivo Y21 5G (V2553) 57/100.
| Danew Konnect 660 | vivo Y21 5G (V2553) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 32/100 | 57/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 35.7 h | 67.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,100 mAh | 6,355 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 61 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | D | A |
| Repairability index | 3.67/5 | 2.98/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP65 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 44 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Konnect 660 | V2553 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.