CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) vs Lenovo Tab K9
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) 64/100, Lenovo Tab K9 64/100.
| CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) | Lenovo Tab K9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | D |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 118.4 h | 80.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 9,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 16 | 3 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.89/5 | 4/5 |
| Repairability class | B | A |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP52 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 15 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CTITANULTRAX | Tab K9 (TB305FU), Tab K9 (TB305XU) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.