Apple iPhone 16 vs Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Apple iPhone 16 25/100, Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 27/100.
| Apple iPhone 16 | Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | C |
| Durability score | 25/100 | 27/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | iOS | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 37 h | 40.8 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 3,561 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 45 |
| Drop reliability class | C | D |
| Repairability index | 2.8/5 | 3.46/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 5 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | A3287 | Z2458 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.