Antteq F2145M vs Shenzhen Jiufang Yingtong Technology WCH-3200M
The Antteq F2145M uses 24 kWh less a year, about €7 a year at the EU average price.
| Antteq F2145M | Shenzhen Jiufang Yingtong Technology WCH-3200M | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | E |
| Annual consumption | 33.1 kWh | 56.9 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €9/year | €16/year |
| Type | monitor | monitor |
| Screen size | 55″ | 34″ |
| Screen size | 22 cm | 86.4 cm |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 px | 3440×1440 px |
| Panel | LED LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Power in SDR mode | 15.1 W | 26 W |
| Standby | 0.5 W | 0.2 W |
| Networked standby | — | 0 W |
| Automatic brightness control | No | No |
| Software updates for at least | 2 years | 8 years |
| Spare parts for at least | 7 years | 8 years |
| Model numbers | F2145M | WCH-3200M |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.