AGM Mobile AGM PAD P2W (EPREL 2371497) vs POCO M8 Pro 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: AGM Mobile AGM PAD P2W (EPREL 2371497) 44/100, POCO M8 Pro 5G 44/100.
| AGM Mobile AGM PAD P2W (EPREL 2371497) | POCO M8 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | G | B |
| Durability score | 44/100 | 44/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 78.1 h | 60.8 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 6,330 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 155 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 3.48/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 99 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | AGM_PAD_P2W | 2510EPC8BG |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.