Acer AS20WF NEO (2025 registration) vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Acer AS20WF NEO (2025 registration) 44/100, Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 44/100.
| Acer AS20WF NEO (2025 registration) | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | E |
| Durability score | 44/100 | 44/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 120 h | 98.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 6,820 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 60 | 0 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 2.4/5 | 2.81/5 |
| Repairability class | D | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP52 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | AS20WF | SM-X210R |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.