Acer A25014 vs RHINO T105
On the EU energy label the Acer A25014 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Acer A25014 34/100, RHINO T105 35/100.
| Acer A25014 | RHINO T105 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | G |
| Durability score | 34/100 | 35/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 80.5 h | 62.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 2 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.19/5 | 2.81/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP52 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 20 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | A25014 (X12-21M) | T105 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.