Most energy-efficient 255/40 ZR19 (2026)
By energy class: B 4 · C 12 · D 3
- 1BMilestone 122760wet grip C · 70 dB
- 2BMilestone 122761wet grip C · 70 dB
- 3BFuntoma 152760wet grip C · 70 dB
- 4BFuntoma 152761wet grip C · 70 dB
- 5CKUMHO Ecsta Sport S 2310653wet grip A · 72 dB
- 6CKumho Ha32 2350093wet grip A · 72 dB
- 7CKumho 2411583wet grip A · 72 dB
- 8CPetlas 28600wet grip B · 71 dB
- 9CPetlas 28603wet grip B · 72 dB
- 10CPetlas 286030wet grip A · 70 dB
- 11CStarmaxx 58600wet grip B · 71 dB
- 12CStarmaxx 58603wet grip B · 72 dB
- 13CStarmaxx 586030wet grip A · 70 dB
- 14CAccelera IOTA EVT ( 9M2615)wet grip B · 71 dB
- 15CAccelera PHI (9M297)wet grip C · 70 dB
- 16CNokian Tyres T433278wet grip A · 73 dB
- 17DKumho 2412553wet grip A · 72 dB
- 18DSyron 2726735wet grip C · 71 dB
- 19DForceum PHI (9M3200)wet grip C · 72 dB
Ranked by annual energy consumption; running cost at the EU average household price. Open a model to see the cost in your country. Methodology
Other tyres
205/55R16195/65R15205/60R16185/65R15315/80R22.5175/65R14215/65R16215/60R16185/60R15195/55R16195/60R15215/60R17