vivo X300 FE (V2542) vs Xiaomi 17T
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: vivo X300 FE (V2542) 36/100, Xiaomi 17T 38/100.
| vivo X300 FE (V2542) | Xiaomi 17T | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 36/100 | 38/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 49.4 h | 65.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,255 mAh | 6,360 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | C | B |
| Repairability index | 2.93/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | V2542 | 2602DPT53G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.