TCL P80 Pro vs vivo X Fold6
On the EU energy label the TCL P80 Pro comes out ahead in 4 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: TCL P80 Pro 64/100, vivo X Fold6 35/100.
| TCL P80 Pro | vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 35/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 66.5 h | 59 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,600 mAh | 6,670 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 140 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.58/5 | 2.87/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP58 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Charging power | 45 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | T852K | V2559 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.