TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro vs vivo V70 (V2538)
On the EU energy label the TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro comes out ahead in 5 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro 61/100, vivo V70 (V2538) 32/100.
| TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro | vivo V70 (V2538) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 61/100 | 32/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 68.4 h | 65.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 900 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,320 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 3.52/5 | 3/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 55 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | T807D | V2538 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.