TCL NXTPAPER 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: TCL NXTPAPER 60 Ultra 45/100, Xiaomi 17 45/100.
| TCL NXTPAPER 60 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 45/100 | 45/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 50.8 h | 64 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 2.85/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 15 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | T951K | 25113PN0EG |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.