REDMI Note 15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: REDMI Note 15 Pro 44/100, Samsung Galaxy A26 5G 44/100.
| REDMI Note 15 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | C |
| Durability score | 44/100 | 44/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 62.6 h | 37.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,350 mAh | 4,860 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 269 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 3.22/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP65 | IP67 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 25100RA69G | SM-A266B/DS |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.