REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air vs TCL NXTPAPER 60 Ultra
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air 45/100, TCL NXTPAPER 60 Ultra 45/100.
| REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air | TCL NXTPAPER 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 45/100 | 45/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 75.2 h | 50.8 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,780 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | C | B |
| Repairability index | 3.36/5 | 2.85/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 80 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | NX799J | T951K |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.