POCO F9 Ultra vs ZTE V80 Vita
On the EU energy label the POCO F9 Ultra comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: POCO F9 Ultra 38/100, ZTE V80 Vita 38/100.
| POCO F9 Ultra | ZTE V80 Vita | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 38/100 | 38/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 80.7 h | 66.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,880 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 80 |
| Drop reliability class | C | D |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 3.46/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 26077PC53G | Z2575 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.