POCO F8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
On the EU energy label the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: POCO F8 Ultra 46/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 52/100.
| POCO F8 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 52/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 67 h | 55 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,330 mAh | 4,855 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 3.08/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | 25102PCBEG | SM-S948B/DS |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.