Oukitel C67 vs POCO M8 5G
On the EU energy label the Oukitel C67 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oukitel C67 39/100, POCO M8 5G 39/100.
| Oukitel C67 | POCO M8 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 39/100 | 39/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 53.3 h | 50.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,370 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 194 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.09/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP65 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | C67 | 25118PC98G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.