Oukitel C36 vs vivo X500 Pro Max
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Oukitel C36 48/100, vivo X500 Pro Max 49/100.
| Oukitel C36 | vivo X500 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 48/100 | 49/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 53.4 h | 72.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 6,570 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.28/5 | 2.97/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 5 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | C36 | V2610 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.