Oukitel C35 vs Samsung Galaxy S25
On the EU energy label the Oukitel C35 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oukitel C35 52/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 52/100.
| Oukitel C35 | Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 52/100 | 52/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59.4 h | 37.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 2,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 3,885 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.36/5 | 3.23/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | C35 | SM-S931B/DS |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.