Oukitel C17 A16 vs REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air
On the EU energy label the Oukitel C17 A16 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oukitel C17 A16 45/100, REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air 45/100.
| Oukitel C17 A16 | REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 45/100 | 45/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 53.8 h | 75.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,780 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 3.43/5 | 3.36/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 80 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | C17 | NX799J |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.