Oppo Reno16 F 5G vs vivo V70 Lite 5G (V2615)
On the EU energy label the Oppo Reno16 F 5G comes out ahead in 3 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oppo Reno16 F 5G 74/100, vivo V70 Lite 5G (V2615) 55/100.
| Oppo Reno16 F 5G | vivo V70 Lite 5G (V2615) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 74/100 | 55/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 75 h | 61.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,800 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,325 mAh | 6,380 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.82/5 | 2.99/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CPH2859 | V2615 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.