Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G vs TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro
On the EU energy label the Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G 77/100, TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro 61/100.
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | TCL NXTPAPER 70 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 66.3 h | 68.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,500 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,035 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 300 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.88/5 | 3.52/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CPH2813 | T807D |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.