Oppo Find X9 vs Philips S8320
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Oppo Find X9 58/100, Philips S8320 58/100.
| Oppo Find X9 | Philips S8320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 69.3 h | 99.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,300 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,840 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 45 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | D | B |
| Repairability index | 3.71/5 | 3.6/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CPH2797 | Philips S8320 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.